<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tipping Point 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intra.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intra.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfdarius</title>
		<link>http://intra.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>rfdarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html#comment-104</guid>
		<description>thanks for the comment, alison.

i&#039;ve seen that about comcast, but do not use their service, so haven&#039;t come into contact with it. there are plenty of other companies also glomming on to new media products like twitter, but i&#039;m wondering when we&#039;ll be able to say it&#039;s here to stay. i think it&#039;s far from it, even though CNN, NYTimes, and WSJ all use it fairly extensively.

what &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; be an enticing way for a company to interact with you online? how about beyond products, and into overall reputation?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the comment, alison.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve seen that about comcast, but do not use their service, so haven&#8217;t come into contact with it. there are plenty of other companies also glomming on to new media products like twitter, but i&#8217;m wondering when we&#8217;ll be able to say it&#8217;s here to stay. i think it&#8217;s far from it, even though CNN, NYTimes, and WSJ all use it fairly extensively.</p>
<p>what <i>would</i> be an enticing way for a company to interact with you online? how about beyond products, and into overall reputation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://intra.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2008/10/tipping-point-20.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any personal experience with this, but I know that there&#039;s a guy at Comcast who watches Twitter &amp; searches blogs, trying to find people who are complaining about the company. He then steps in and tries to resolve whatever issue the customer is having. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumerist.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Consumerist&lt;/a&gt; often points out this type of thing when it happens.)

Most of my experience of being &quot;interacted with&quot; by companies is in the form of half-baked comments to my blog. For example, on a recent post about weatherizing my apartment, someone left a long comment about how to deal with the door. It was perfectly useful information and she wasn&#039;t shilling a product, but her link went back to a webpage for a company that sold stoves (for heat, not cooking) and so I was immediately suspicious. Ultimately I didn&#039;t allow the comment to be posted. I see this kind of thing as companies trying to use the community (however small) that I have built to sell whatever they are trying to sell, and that&#039;s not the point of my blog. For heavens&#039; sake, I&#039;m not even making money off of it, I&#039;m certainly not going to help anyone else use my blog to do so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any personal experience with this, but I know that there&#8217;s a guy at Comcast who watches Twitter &amp; searches blogs, trying to find people who are complaining about the company. He then steps in and tries to resolve whatever issue the customer is having. (<a href="http://www.consumerist.com/" rel="nofollow">Consumerist</a> often points out this type of thing when it happens.)</p>
<p>Most of my experience of being &#8220;interacted with&#8221; by companies is in the form of half-baked comments to my blog. For example, on a recent post about weatherizing my apartment, someone left a long comment about how to deal with the door. It was perfectly useful information and she wasn&#8217;t shilling a product, but her link went back to a webpage for a company that sold stoves (for heat, not cooking) and so I was immediately suspicious. Ultimately I didn&#8217;t allow the comment to be posted. I see this kind of thing as companies trying to use the community (however small) that I have built to sell whatever they are trying to sell, and that&#8217;s not the point of my blog. For heavens&#8217; sake, I&#8217;m not even making money off of it, I&#8217;m certainly not going to help anyone else use my blog to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

